Fareclock and Hubstaff are known to be leading time tracking and workforce management solutions for businesses across a wide range of industries.
Fareclock is a complete workforce management solution that offers automated tools for time tracking, attendance management, HR functions, payroll computations, reporting, and data collection. On the other hand, Hubstaff is a time tracking platform designed to monitor productivity, time usage, and job performance across remote and field teams.
While both platforms offer robust time-tracking capabilities, they’re designed with different priorities, strengths, and use cases in mind. In this article, we’ll take a closer look at Fareclock and Hubstaff, comparing their key features, pricing, and app capabilities to highlight the differences and help you determine which solution is the right fit for your business.
Note: Product comparisons and verdicts presented in this article are only based on our personal research and hands-on testing of their console and app. Our stated assessments reflect only our own informed perspectives and opinions, and are intended to provide an objective evaluation of each product’s features, usability, and overall performance.
Quick Feature Comparison Table
| Feature / Functionality |
|
|
| Advanced Facial Recognition | ✅ | ❌ |
| Start and Stop Live Timer | ❌ | ✅ |
| Briefings | ✅ | ❌ |
| Credentials | ✅ | ❌ |
| Job Costing | ✅ | ❌ |
| Screenshot Tracking | ❌ | ✅ |
| App and URL Monitoring | ❌ | ✅ |
| Project and Task Tracking | ❌ | ✅ |
| Mobile App Access | ✅ | ✅ |











